![]() The effect size was measured through the partial eta-squared. Then, just for analysis of the data, they were divided into two groups: the group without signs/symptoms (n = 26 65.15 ± 9.7 years) and the group with signs/symptoms (n = 22 66.77 ± 14.4 years). Second, they underwent 36 sessions of the cardiovascular rehabilitation program to evaluate signs/symptoms. ![]() ![]() First, the patients had their personal details collected, and the autonomic modulation at rest was evaluated by HRV. The protocol was divided into two stages. To carry out the present observational longitudinal study, 48 patients were analyzed. To analyze the correlation between the appearance of signs/symptoms during a cardiovascular rehabilitation program and linear indexes of the heart rate variability (HRV) at rest. The AACVPR protocol showed a significant relationship between the risk classes and the occurrence of simple complications, however, the low values obtained for sensitivity, specificity and accuracy show that it is not useful for this purpose. The other protocols analyzed were not significant: American College of Sports Medicine ( P-value = 0.801), Brazilian Society of Cardiology ( P-value = 0.734), American Heart Association ( P-value = 0.957), Pashkow ( P-value = 0.790), Society French Cardiology ( P-value = 0.314), and Spanish Society of Cardiology ( P-value = 0.078). The American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR) protocol showed a statistically significant relationship between simple complications and cardiac risk classes ( P-value = 0.046), however the results of sensitivity (0.53), specificity (0.52), and accuracy (0.53) were not significant. The relationship between the cardiac risk classes of seven risk stratification protocols and the occurrence of simple complications (such angina, abnormal changes in blood pressure, arrhythmias, fatigue, muscle pain, pallor) was assessed using the chi-square test, and when statistical significance was observed, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were determined.Ībout 76 patients were analyzed. Patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease and/or risk factors. Outpatient clinic of cardiovascular rehabilitation. This study evaluated the capacity of cardiac risk stratification protocols on simple complications that occur during activities of a cardiovascular rehabilitation program. So, the patients are going to perform their cardiovascular rehabilitation routines for 6 months and then, their clinical, physical, and biochemical parameters are going to be measured again and they are going to be followed during 24 sessions during their CRP routines in order to identify the appearance of their signals/symptoms. Then, the patients are going to be followed during 24 sessions during their CRP routines in order to identify appearance of their signals/symptoms. First, their risk stratification is going to be performed by 2 evaluators and their clinical, physical, and biochemical parameters are going to be measured. Forty-four patient participants of a CRP will be evaluated. The study was prospectively registered at (NCT03446742). The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between risk stratification protocols and clinical, physical, and biochemical parameters with the appearance of signals/symptoms during CRP, as well as to evaluate if modifications on clinical, physical, and biochemical parameters could influence in the appearance of signals/symptoms during CRP. Furthermore, clinical, physical, and biochemical parameters have been used as risk markers for the appearance of adverse events, and to investigate their efficacy to previse signals and symptoms during the CRP sessions that could better guide the strategies adopted on these programs. Risk stratification protocols are commonly used to identify risks during the physical exercise however, studies that investigate their efficacy to previse signals and symptoms are inconclusive. Despite the benefits, cardiovascular rehabilitation programs (CRPs) have been related to the appearance of signals and symptoms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |